A look at Google’s Guidelines classifies us for Quality Raters the search intentions that Google manages at a very macro level. Remember that we came from a very old previous version that present us with a search classification that was limit to “informative”, “navigational”, “transactional” and “multimia”.
It was a more specializ
Way and focus on classifying “WEBS” and only websites. Now we move on to the world of real intentions: wants and then it will see what it will give as an answer. These are two separate steps: knowing what we ne and offering us the most appropriate answer.
Google classifies searches into
KNOW, DO, Websites and Visit in Person (locations). All of these are nes. They are what Google wants/can/will-somay-be-able to solve for us. It wants to stockholder database help us know things, do things and find the websites and places we are looking for.
This classification, without
A doubt, helps it more in this task than simply classifying textual searches as it did before. The best thing is that this classification is not valid for now, it is valid for as long as Google continues to pursue its intention of helping us and solving things for this skill is useful in any professional activity us instead of finding them.
Offering solutions implies specializing in each one of them
If you hire a handyman who can put up a wall, replace a pipe, or fix some sockets. You know you’re taking a risk: he’s not a specialist and could cause. A you problems in the future. In short, he may not give you the best solution.
If someone ask you and demand that
You recommend someone who would solve a problem in the right way, you probably wouldn’t recommend your handyman (your reputation and brand are at stake and he. S could mess things up). You should first know what he’s really tg data good at and only recommend him for those jobs.