Answer the public to find out what questions people ask about an entity, but then it is not just a matter of putting them in an H2 to see if we are lucky… it is about making an effort to answer them correctly, clearly and directly in a single paragraph.
That is why there are people
Who, depending on their way of writing, are very successful in seeking these types of results and people who do not get even one.
Well, having understood the advances in this field, what we are left with are searches in which the user wants to know something but either it is not clear what information they want, or there are several possible answers, or it is impossible to briefly respond to their problem.
In these cases we are in the normal
“KNOW QUERIES” and we are lucky because when it comes to content, Google continues to use very similar positioning criteria to those of years ago vk database to position all this.
That is to say, everything you’ve known for
A long time about SEO, whether you’re focusing on academic texts, specializ blogs like this one, explaining processes and how-to’s, or providing information they ask interesting questions on logic to the public (magazines, news, etc.), continues to work more or less the same. That’s why, after each update, we see that those who complain the most or dance with joy are sites of another type.
We have the add benefit of the
EEA, which makes it clear that textual content should be measur by the experience (in terms of both knowlge and time spent working) that it demonstrates in the subject, its cribility and its authority in the sector, but we know that measuring a tg data real EEA would be a very expensive process and Google takes it into account as a guide but not as a develop algorithm.